Just a quick post to highlight a nice one-minute video of Mark Logic’s own Matt Turner, captured making a few predictions at the SIIA’s 2010 Information Industry Summit in snowy New York City.
I’ve embedded it below:
Just a quick post to highlight a nice one-minute video of Mark Logic’s own Matt Turner, captured making a few predictions at the SIIA’s 2010 Information Industry Summit in snowy New York City.
I’ve embedded it below:
Posted in Information and Media, SIIA
In creating my presentation for this past December’s Mark Logic 2010 Digital Publishing Summit, I had a “creative moment” when I made a slide that made me think: wow, perhaps I’m onto something here.
The slide was a list of six things that publishers should be able to do with their content. For this blog post, I’d say the scope includes publishers of any ilk, professional publishers whose content is their business and “accidental” publishers — i.e., enterprises whose primary business is not content publishing, but where content nevertheless plays a mission-critical role (e.g., doctrine for the Army, in-flight manuals for airlines, or maintenance procedures for medical devices, such as PET scanners).
So, if content either is your business or is mission-critical to it, then here are the six things you should be able to do with it:
When information providers can do these six things with their content, they are ready to move successfully to the “post web 2.0″ online age.
Posted in digital publishing, Information and Media
As part of my company’s focus on the media industry, I sit on a few industry groups where I have the opportunity to spend quality time with senior media and publishing industry executives.
Like any CEO, I have a natural tendency to believe that my company is, if not totally counter-cyclical, at least somewhat immune to the effects of the economic downturn. I’ve heard enough CEOs make the claim (cf: this query), often where it’s ostensibly absurd, that I should ask myself if I don’t have a case of CEO denial. Am I arguing something akin to the rise in bedbugs is good for the hotel industry or not?
So when a recent publishing executive group I sit on started to discuss the economic downturn, I turned up my defenses to make sure I didn’t have my happy ears on.
But executive after executive said that they believed the downturn is accelerating the digital publishing transformation. Not because I said it. Not because, as a technology supplier that helps companies transition, I want it to be true. But because about a dozen senior folks from many different publishing sectors said it.
Why?
Now that I see the picture, it’s clear: after roughly a decade of fence-setting, the downturn is forcing publishers of all ilks to move. The downturn is accelerating the transition to digital publishing. And that’s not happy ears.
I just stumbled into this pithy post from Greenhouse Associates, a boutique strategy consultancy that serves firms in the information and media market. The post, entitled Counter-Intuitive Tactics for Bad Times, lists seven non-obvious tactics that companies should consider when managing through tough times.
The list is below, along with a brief parenthetic comment on each item:
The full article is here.
Posted in Information and Media, Publishing 2.0, strategy
I’ve previously blogged about the StartWithXML project that O’Reilly is working on with the folks at Idea Logical.
Overall, the project reminds me of the California Milk Advisory Board: get a bunch of diary farmers together to push an idea they can all agree on — eat California cheese. (Which, by the way, was articulated in my favorite way through the famous Grandma commercial.)
Here, instead of dairy farmers, it’s content and publishing vendors (e.g., codeMantra, Jouve / Publishing Dimensions, Klopotek, Firebrand, and Really Strategies). But the idea is similar — get a bunch of vendors together who can agree on one thing — in this case, starting with XML — and go push that idea.
Towards that end, the project is doing a few things. First, they’re hosting a one-day forum in New York City on January 13, 2009. They’ve recently run an educational webcast entitled Essential Tools of an XML Workflow, slides below.
They’ve run a survey and are producing a research report as well. Below are some slides that highlight selected results from the survey.
Some takeaways:
Now, none of this is a big surprise to those who work with the information and media market. The clear leaders in XML adoption were STM publishers (e.g., Elsevier), followed by those in other segments like education and B2B trade. At the mid tier, you see folks like legal, tax, and regulatory publishers and market researchers. Bringing up the rear you have consumer magazines, news, and trade publishers.
While some trade publishers (e.g., Simon and Schuster) are strong adopters of XML, it seems that most others are way behind. This will get increasingly dangerous as the Kindle takes off (I’m a user and a big fan) and the Google Books settlement turns Google into an Amazon-rival online bookseller, overnight.
If a publisher can’t output for the Kindle, pretty soon a lot of people won’t be buying your books. Right now, a quick search reveals about 200K titles for the Kindle out of 24M total on Amazon, but that number will be increasing fast. And if you can’t output in the appropriate format for Google Books to ingest your content, then for many customers, your books won’t even exist.
Trade publishers need to get moving to enable flexible output to both different print (e.g., large print, library editions) and e-book formats. The good news? 46% of trade publishers believe their business will benefit by publishing in more e-book formats and nearly 70% say print-to-web processes are problematic or need to be fixed soon.
I wonder if moving from scrolls to paper was as difficult. Well, I suppose it was.
The folks at O’Reilly Media have created an excellent blog around their ToC (Tools of Change for Publishing) meme and event. As part of that, they are running a series called StartWithXML that has some excellent material on the topic of XML and publishing.
One of the first posts in the StartWithXML project is entitled Why You Should Care About XML by Andrew Savikas, with whom I had the pleasure of speaking on a panel at the Gilbane conference in San Francisco a few months back. Excerpt:
But there are several reasons why it’s really really important for publishers to start paying attention to XML right now, and across their entire workflow:
- XML is here to stay, for the reasonably forseeable future. While it’s always dangerous to attempt to predict expiration dates on technology, I think it’s fair to assume XML will have a shelf life at least as long as ASCII, which has been with us for more than 40 years, and isn’t going anywhere soon.
- Web publishing and print publishing are converging, and writing and production for print will be much more influenced by the Web than vice-versa. It will only get harder to succeed in publishing without putting the Web on par with (or ahead of) print as the primary target. The longer you wait to get that content into Web-friendly and re-usable XML, the worse.
Many in publishing balk at bringing XML “up the stack” to the production, editing, or even the authoring stage. And with good reason; XML isn’t really meant to be created or edited by hand (though a nice feature is that in a pinch it easily can be). There are two places to look for useful clues about how XML will actually fit into a publisher’s workflow: Web publishing and the “alpha geeks.”
He then goes on to examining both web publishing and alpha geek behavior in order to provide a lay of the future publishing land. See the post for more.
O’Reilly is also hosting a StartWithXML one-day forum in New York City on 1/13/09 at the McGraw-Hill Auditorium.
A rather overdue post to highlight that Mark Logic was featured a few months back in an EContent Magazine story entitled Reaping Information: Dynamic Navigation Helps Users (PDF).
Excerpts:
Delivering information in ways that make the most sense to users is a key characteristic of MarkLogic Server, an XML Server that allows users to store, manage, manipulate, and deliver information
Indeed, a key use-case for MarkLogic is as an information delivery platform. More:
Media company ALM uses MarkLogic Server for its enterprise content repository, which holds more than 2 decades worth of news and analysis for and about the legal market.
ALM was acquired by Incisive Media a while back but nevertheless remains a customer. More:
Oxford University Press has organized its reference works on African-Americans into a central repository it calls the African American Studies Center (AASC), which allows researchers the ability to search through images and articles, arranging them in chronological order.
AASC is not only a very cool MarkLogic-based application, but also — perhaps more importantly — it’s just one slice of Oxford’s content.
Once a publisher builds their content application platform, it is relatively easy to take different slices of their content to build new and different information products. For example, Oxford Islamic Studies Online (OISO) is built on the same platform as the AASC, and I’m sure the OISO’s marginal development cost was reduced because it could leverage the fixed costs invested the development of OUP’s (MarkLogic-based) publishing platform.