Site icon Kellblog

Transitioning from Founder-Led Sales: The “We Need More Schmedleys” Problem

I remember how silly the board looked that day. Reviewing the slide with performance by salesrep, an alpha board member impatiently shouted the seemingly obvious conclusion: “Look, only one rep — Joe Schmedley — is performing. Everyone else is struggling. The solution to our problem is quite simple: we need more Schmedleys.”

I had to kick about three executives under the table to prevent them from bursting into uproarious laughter. The last thing we needed, the team knew, was more Schmedleys.

Joe Schmedley wasn’t a bad guy. A competent, if somewhat bumbling, enterprise rep. Affable. Could talk about local sports teams. Not a bad guy to have a beer with. Not a particularly good guy at driving paperwork through procurement. Average to a skooch above in most respects. The last thing we needed to do was define our hiring profile by his background and tell a recruiter to go find ten more of them.

So what was driving this false signal in the data? The numbers don’t lie, right? And by the numbers, Schmedley was crushing it. Consistently our top rep.

What’s going on here?

What if I told you:

Like some successful salesreps, Schmedley had found himself in the right place at the right time. We knew it. Heck, he wasn’t arrogant, I think he knew it. The only people who didn’t know it were the board, who was actively telling us to hire ten more Schmedleys, making him the archetype for all future sales hires.

The problem was, of course, that the big customer was effectively a “house account,” and Schmedley merely a steward. We were in the midst of the transition from founder-led sales to sales-led sales and the board was confusing the account’s success with Schmedley’s.

What can you do to avoid this problem?

Exit mobile version